Grants management spans some of the most consequential decisions government makes—distributing billions of dollars to advance public missions from research to social services. Yet many agencies manage grants on outdated systems with manual processes that create inefficiency, compliance risk, and frustration for applicants and administrators alike.
This guide provides a framework for grants management technology modernization, addressing the unique challenges of managing award lifecycles in government environments.
The Grants Management Landscape
Why Modernization Matters
Grants management systems affect multiple stakeholders:
Applicants: Researchers, nonprofits, and other recipients navigate application processes. Complex, paper-based processes deter qualified applicants.
Program staff: Administrators manage applications, awards, and compliance. Manual processes consume time that could support program oversight.
Leadership: Decision-makers need visibility into portfolios, performance, and risk. Disconnected systems obscure insight.
Oversight: Auditors and inspectors general require consistent records. Poor data management creates compliance exposure.
Current State Challenges
Many grants management environments suffer from:
Fragmented systems: Multiple disconnected systems for different grant programs or lifecycle stages.
Manual processes: Paper applications, manual data entry, and spreadsheet-based tracking.
Limited visibility: Inability to see portfolio-wide status, performance, or risk.
Compliance burden: Manual compliance checking and documentation.
Poor applicant experience: Cumbersome processes that discourage applications.
Integration gaps: Disconnection from financial systems, SAM.gov, and other federal infrastructure.
Grants Management Technology Framework
The Award Lifecycle
Modern grants management systems support the full lifecycle:
Pre-award:
- Funding opportunity announcement
- Application intake
- Eligibility screening
- Merit review
- Award decision
Award execution:
- Award notification
- Negotiation and acceptance
- Award document generation
- System of record creation
Post-award:
- Progress reporting
- Financial monitoring
- Compliance checking
- Modifications and amendments
- Closeout
Analytics and oversight:
- Portfolio visibility
- Performance analytics
- Risk identification
- Audit support
Core System Capabilities
Modern grants management platforms provide:
Application management:
- Online application submission
- Application builder for different programs
- Eligibility screening automation
- Merit review workflow
- Document management
Award management:
- Award processing workflow
- Award document generation
- Obligation tracking
- Modification processing
- Automated notifications
Recipient monitoring:
- Progress report submission and review
- Financial reporting and drawdown
- On-site review management
- Risk assessment tools
- Compliance monitoring
Financial integration:
- Obligation and commitment tracking
- Payment processing or handoff
- Cost sharing tracking
- Accounting system integration
Reporting and analytics:
- Portfolio dashboards
- Performance metrics
- Risk indicators
- Compliance reporting
- DATA Act and FFATA reporting
Integration Requirements
Grants systems must connect with broader infrastructure:
Federal integrations:
- SAM.gov for entity validation and exclusion checking
- DUNS/UEI for entity identification
- USAspending.gov for transparency reporting
- Payment systems for disbursement
Internal integrations:
- Financial management systems
- Document management
- Identity management
- Correspondence systems
Implementation Approach
Platform Options
Several approaches to grants management modernization:
Commercial grants management systems: Purpose-built platforms like Salesforce Grants Management, eCivis, Amplifund, or specialized government solutions.
Federal shared services: Leveraging federal-wide solutions where available.
Custom development: Building grant-specific systems (typically only for unique requirements).
Portal-focused: Modern user-facing layers on existing backend systems.
Migration Considerations
Modernizing existing environments:
Data migration: Historical grant data, documents, and records require careful migration.
Process redesign: Don't automate broken processes; redesign for efficiency.
Change management: Staff adaptation to new systems and processes.
Cutover planning: Managing transition from old to new systems.
Compliance Alignment
Grants management is heavily regulated:
Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200): Federal grants administration requirements.
Agency-specific requirements: Particular program regulations.
DATA Act: Spending transparency requirements.
Grants reporting: FFATA and other transparency obligations.
Systems must support compliance, not work around it.
Key Takeaways
-
Lifecycle coverage matters: Disconnected point solutions create gaps. Aim for integrated lifecycle management.
-
Applicant experience is program quality: Cumbersome processes deter good applicants. Modern UX improves program outcomes.
-
Integration is essential: Grants don't exist in isolation. Systems must connect with financial, compliance, and transparency infrastructure.
-
Compliance is built-in: Compliance requirements should be embedded in systems, not checked after the fact.
-
Data enables oversight: Good grants management generates data enabling portfolio visibility, risk identification, and performance insight.
Frequently Asked Questions
Should we buy or build grants management systems? Buy for common functionality; configure for program-specific needs; build only for unique requirements not addressed by commercial solutions. Most agencies should evaluate commercial platforms.
How do we handle multiple disconnected grants systems? Options include: consolidating on single platform, implementing integration layer, replacing incrementally program by program. The right approach depends on system current state and investment capacity.
What about paper-based legacy programs? Prioritize modernization based on volume and impact. High-volume programs benefit most from automation. Some low-volume programs may continue manual processes during phased modernization.
How long does grants management modernization take? Depends on scope and approach. Single-program modernization might take 6-12 months. Enterprise-wide transformation typically spans 2-4 years.
How do we maintain compliance during transition? Parallel operation during transition; comprehensive testing; clear cutover criteria; documented rollback plans. Compliance requirements don't pause for modernization.
What about small grants programs? Smaller programs may not justify dedicated systems. Consider enterprise platforms serving multiple programs, shared services, or simplified solutions scaled to program size.